ST.Eagles Chairman Submits 1 Terabyte of Evidence on Series of Referee “Rigging Calls” Leading to Bitter Loss Against Broncos
Philadelphia, October 6, 2025 – In a shocking move that has rocked the American football world, Philadelphia Eagles Chairman and owner Jeffrey Lurie has submitted a massive package of evidence totaling 1 terabyte of data to the National Football League (NFL) office. This evidence focuses on referee decisions alleged to be “rigged” (rigging calls) in the recent game between the Eagles and Denver Broncos, resulting in the Eagles’ 24-21 defeat. Lurie argues that these errors not only impacted the game’s outcome but are part of a prolonged series of issues that undermine the sport’s fairness.
The game took place on October 5, 2025, at Lincoln Financial Field, where the Eagles led in the first half but collapsed in the second due to a series of controversial referee calls. Lurie’s evidence package includes detailed video analyses, statistical data, and social media posts from fans, proving that the Eagles were systematically disadvantaged. “This isn’t the first time,” a source close to the team stated. “Chairman Lurie has been collecting data from previous games, but the loss to the Broncos was the final straw.”
Below is a detailed analysis of the three most controversial referee situations in the game, based on the videos and evidence highlighted by Lurie. These plays have been hotly debated on social media, with thousands of comments from Eagles fans claiming the referees were “biased” toward the Broncos.
Situation 1: No Defensive Pass Interference (DPI) Penalty on Dallas Goedert
In the final moments of the game, as the Eagles attempted a comeback, quarterback Jalen Hurts threw a deep pass toward tight end Dallas Goedert. The replay video shows Broncos defender (number 22, likely Patrick Surtain II) making early contact with Goedert, pulling his jersey and shoulder down before the ball arrived. Frames from the video clearly display: At seconds 0-2, Goedert is running his route freely; by seconds 3-5, the Broncos defender is hugging tightly and pulling him down; the ball flies over his head at seconds 6-7 with no chance to catch it. This is a classic DPI under NFL rules, which could have given the Eagles a favorable position to score.
However, the referees did not throw a flag, resulting in an incomplete pass and the Eagles losing their opportunity. Many experts believe that if penalized, the Eagles could have had a first down in the red zone. Some counterarguments suggest Hurts’ pass was underthrown (thrown low), making it hard to catch, but Lurie argues the early contact was a clear violation. This situation has enraged Eagles fans, with comments like “Refs are blind” spreading widely.
View video and discussion here
Situation 2: Ruling Incomplete Pass Instead of Fumble by Bo Nix
In the second half, Broncos quarterback Bo Nix (number 10) was heavily pursued by Eagles defender (number 90, Jordan Davis) while attempting to pass the ball. The video shows Nix losing control of the ball before his arm fully moved forward: At seconds 0-5, Nix is holding the ball and gets hit; seconds 6-10, the ball flies out and travels about 5 yards forward; seconds 11-15, players scramble for it. Subtitles from the broadcast replay emphasize: “He’s gonna be really close watch this” and “Of course all turnovers are reviewed,” indicating this was a play needing close scrutiny.
The referees initially ruled it an incomplete pass, and after an automatic review, upheld the decision, not considering it a fumble. The Eagles could have recovered the ball in a good position if it were a fumble, altering the game’s momentum. Lurie points out that under the “tuck rule” (the arm must fully move forward), this was clearly a loss of possession. Many Broncos fans defend that Nix’s arm was in forward progress, but video evidence shows the ball left his hand earlier. This situation is seen as “robbing” the Eagles of a potential turnover.
View video and discussion here
Situation 3: Unnecessary Roughness Penalty on Zack Baun
In a key running play by the Broncos, running back (number 33, Javonte Williams) was extending his arm to reach first down on fourth-and-one. Eagles linebacker Zack Baun (number 53) dove in for a hard hit, with helmet-to-helmet contact as the runner was nearly down. Video frames illustrate: Seconds 0-4, Williams runs and extends his arm; seconds 5-8, Baun executes a dive tackle with head contact; seconds 9-11, Williams falls and the referee throws the flag. Broadcast subtitles: “Terrible error right here with a brought up 4th and one” and “Oh no, you cannot do that,” reflecting the commentators’ surprise.
The referees penalized unnecessary roughness (unnecessary roughness), giving the Broncos an additional 15 yards and an automatic first down, allowing them to sustain the drive and score later. Lurie argues the play was reasonable since the runner was still advancing, not a late hit, and Baun was just trying to prevent the first down. However, some view it as a violation of player safety rules, especially with head contact. This situation “gifted” the Broncos offensive momentum, contributing to their victory.
View video and discussion here
In the statement accompanying the evidence, Chairman Jeffrey Lurie emphasized: “The Broncos won, and that can’t be changed, but I can’t accept the Eagles being screwed game after game. If you search for Referee on social media, we’re definitely the hottest topic. I’m sending this evidence in hopes the NFL won’t let it continue, so football can be as fair as possible.”
The NFL has not yet issued an official response, but sources indicate the referee committee will review the data package. Eagles fans are calling for an independent investigation, while the Broncos dismiss the allegations, calling them “excuses for the loss.” This incident could lead to rule changes or referee penalties, heating up the debate on transparency in the NFL.
