Mtp.BREAKING: Joe Rogan REVEALS Candace Owens WARNED Charlie Kirk About His Widow — “He Didn’t Listen”

He set it up in a way that like, okay, you’re saying something that’s actually factually inaccurate according to the narrative. Now, let’s be real clear. I don’t necessarily think they know what’s going on yet. There’s a lot of weird [ __ ] going on with this. I know for they not know what they do. That man, that young man I forgive him.

The internet’s just gone to [ __ ] hell, hasn’t it? It really has. It’s finished. And I’m all for jokes, especially dark jokes, but taking the piss out of a woman for her mourning her murdered husband. Is that where it is now? Is it? [ __ ] hell. But I want to take the start of this show to address some of the things that have been going around on public, namely about a text, a group text chain that has been made known uh and released uh by Candace Owens.

 And I just want to address it headon because uh you know that was a text grab a screen grab that I had shared uh with people. So it it is authentic. It was cut from a larger conversation, leading many to believe there’s a lot more to it than meets the eye. And then it all started to explode. Joe Rogan, yes, that Joe Rogan, just jumped right into this investigation.

 He opened up on his podcast and man, what he accidentally revealed has the internet going crazy. New analysis, speculation, and questions are popping up every hour. So, grab your snacks, sit down, and buckle up because the Charlie Kirk case just entered a whole new, more complicated and shocking chapter. [Music] According to inside sources, Joe Rogan is said to have theorized that Erica Kirk may have been the root cause of the rift between Candace Owens and Charlie in the final months before his death.

And this is where things start to get complicated. According to the story, Candace tried to warn Charlie that Erica might have been influenced or manipulated by some force. But instead of listening, Charlie gradually distanced himself from her. Not long after, the fateful event occurred, leaving everyone stunned.

 But wait, the story doesn’t end there. Sources close to the matter say Joe Rogan believes Erica may know more than she’s publicly shared. And that has left the public with a host of new questions about her role in this mysterious chain of events. And this is where Candace Owen steps into the center of the storm. She is said to have conducted her own independent investigation to find out the truth about the Charlie Kirk case.

Whenever the authority says something and not prod any further uh we can’t allow that to happen here. I won’t allow that to happen here because this something terrible has traumatized the world. Okay? And I feel as though when it when it comes to this, the media, the government, the talking heads, everyone is confusing us about what actually took place uh with.

In the process, Candace shared information that made many people question the transparency of the investigative agency, especially the FBI. She asked, “Why were they so quick to conclude that Tyler Robinson was the sole perpetrator? Why was evidence released in small doses while many important details were kept secret? And why did some testimony and reports contradict their own internal documents? Candace believes that some elements of the case were manipulated to shape public opinion, making Tyler Robinson the public face of the entire story,

while the real person responsible has not been exposed. The more the public heard, the more confused they became. Because when official reports of Tyler being turned in by relatives after being wanted, coupled with rumors of his self harm, began to look more like a scripted scenario than the natural truth.

 And it was at that point that the Charlie Kirk affair shifted from a political tragedy to a maze of suspicion, power, and secrecy. Each new question raised only reinforced the belief that something much bigger was going on behind the scenes. Just hours after FBI Director Cash Patel announced online that the investigation was expanding and that the agency was willing to look into conspiracy theories circulating, Candace Owens responded with a strong response.

Without waiting, she posted a lengthy post on her social media platform, a statement that was seen as a direct attack on the federal agency itself. In the post, Candace dismissed a series of FBI stories, including the widely repeated media story that Tyler Robinson’s father had turned in his son and that Tyler had attempted to harm himself after being arrested.

 She called it all a fabrication designed to manipulate public perception. She wrote, “Tyler Robinson never intended to harm himself. The entire story that has been circulating in the media is fiction, as are many other details in the report we’ve been told.” Owens continued, “There is no hard evidence that Tyler was ever on the Utah Valley University campus.

 There is no video, no clear photo, just a blurry photo that his family insists is not him at all.” And then Candace’s final words set the internet ablaze. The federal government is lying about everything except that the gun was Tyler’s. The post went viral. Millions of shares, thousands of comments, and a wave of fierce debate spread across political forums, social media, and podcasts.

 Candace’s supporters say she is doing what the mainstream press is afraid to do, questioning the power and transparency of the investigative agency. Opponents, on the other hand, accuse her of fueling the fire and sewing doubt in the public. But Candace doesn’t stop there. In subsequent live streams, she continued to refute each point of the FBI report, insisting that the Tyler Robinson story was being manipulated to close the case too quickly.

 As the holes became more and more apparent, people could no longer trust the redacted reports, she asserted. There was something bigger going on, and I was not going to be silent until the truth was revealed. And from that moment on, Candace Owens became more than just a commentator. She became the center of the fight for the truth in the Charlie Kirk case.

 One of the first details Candace Anin Owens publicly challenged and the one that sparked the most public discussion was the FBI shared video that allegedly showed Tyler Robinson running across a rooftop shortly after the Charlie Kirk incident. [Music] Look at that video. She said, “There’s no way that’s Tyler.

” Owens said there was a crucial medical fact the investigators deliberately omitted. Tyler Robinson actually had mild paralysis in his right leg, making it impossible for him to move as quickly as he did in the video. This is, she argued, not only negated the authenticity of the video, but also overturned the entire official story the FBI had been pushing for weeks.

 In its previous report, the feds had suggested that Tyler was limping because he was concealing a weapon under his clothing. Candace flatly denied. No, that gate is not because he’s hiding anything. It’s because he’s had foot problems for years. His family knows it. His friends know it, and the medical records prove it.

 Owen said she received inside information from someone close to the Robinson family, confirming that it was the limp that helped them identify their son in the video, not the blurry face the FBI shared. The Robinson family reportedly made this clear during their interview with federal agents, saying, “Yes, that’s Tyler’s gate, but he couldn’t have moved that fast.

 The image they’re releasing doesn’t match reality.” Candace stressed that the FBI’s misinterpretation of Tyler’s gate is evidence that they either don’t have the facts or they’re trying to hide something. She continued, “If an investigative agency was truly transparent, they would release the entire video instead of cutting together a few seconds to support a pre-existing scenario.

” Owens then raised larger questions. Why was only a portion of the video released? Why was there no footage from surrounding security cameras? And how was the alleged suspect able to move through a heavily secured area without anyone stopping him? Those questions have spread widely on social media, creating a wave of doubt about the reliability of the FBI’s video evidence.

Independent observers who analyze the footage frame by frame have also pointed out that the height, body proportions, and speed of movement of the person in the clip do not match Tyler Robinson’s actual physical profile. Owens said she warned that garbled or misinterpreted evidence is often used to manipulate public opinion.

 She called it a perfect example of a story being crafted to shape public belief. And as she ended her live stream that day, her words sent shivers down viewers’ spines. They said Tyler was limping because he was hiding something. But the truth is, they were hiding something. Since then, the man on the roof video has become an internet sensation, dissected across forums, podcasts, and independent news outlets.

Although the FBI has remained silent, public pressure has mounted as many have begun to believe that the most important piece of the puzzle, the truth, may have been edited, cut, or even retconed. This, according to Candace Owens, perfectly explains why the public has never seen a full video of the alleged perpetrator, just carefully select blurry stills.

 She argues that this limitation has allowed investigators to create a plausible scenario for the public. That the person in the photo is limping because he is carrying a heavy object in his clothing, not for any other reason. Candace says they show us one moment, the limp, and then they write a whole story around it. But when the truth comes out, it doesn’t match up.

 As soon as she made her statement, the online community immediately began digging into Tyler Robinson’s personal life. Fans, independent observers, and people who knew Tyler have shared a series of old videos that clearly show that he really does have problems with his right leg and cannot move as quickly as the person in the clip released by the FBI.

 First of all, there was that one guy who is the decoy. All right, so you got this guy who’s an older guy who starts yelling out, “Didn’t he take his pants down?” He took his pants down. This guy uh was at 911. He was at the Boston bombings. He called in a fake bomb at another place and then he did this at this thing right after. So somehow or another, this guy has the state of mind that the moment someone gets shot, he yells out and says, “I did it. I did it.

” And takes his pants down or something like that. I don’t know exactly what he did. Then ready for this? He gets arrested for child porn right away. Right after this happened. Well, right away. He’s in jail for child porn. Why is that? Well, now you can’t interview him. These findings have caused a stir in public opinion. If true, it means that the person appearing in the video cannot be Tyler Robinson, and the entire official story of the incident may have been more sophisticatedly staged than we thought.

And amid the escalating controversy, another detail has emerged that has further confused the public. Tyler Robinson was awarded a presidential resident scholarship from Utah State University worth about 32,000 for 4 years of study. A young man once described as having a bright future, a student honored for his academics and sense of responsibility has suddenly become the center of a political incident that has shaken the country.

Candace Owens quickly picked up on this detail, saying, “We’re talking about a former Utah State University honorary scholar, not some unknown person. What happened between the image of a model student and the story the media is telling?” That question echoed across social media. And as more people began to review the videos themselves, comparing frames and comparing data, more and more conflicting evidence emerged, leading the public to question, “Are we just seeing part of a bigger picture, the part that someone wants us

to believe is true?” Candace concluded in a live stream, “When they show you still images, ask why? Because sometimes what’s hidden is the most powerful.” And from there, the Tyler Robinson case became more than just an investigation. It became a test of trust, transparency, and the ability to distinguish between truth and falsehood.

 In an age of mediadriven media, Candace took the situation to the next level by publicly criticizing the FBI, accusing them of withholding information about the possibility of a second person being involved. According to her, a witness sent the FBI a recording that suggested the alleged shooter was not alone. In the recording, the witness claimed that a woman was seen with the suspect who may have assisted him in leaving the scene shortly after the incident.

Candace said on her live broadcast, “I don’t want to say this is absolutely true until we have hard evidence. All we have is the witness’s account, and I think that’s credible, but I need something more solid.” She then revealed that even stronger evidence had emerged. Owens said she and her team reviewed the video Shainer had posted online, a clip that has since been completely removed from the internet.

 We downloaded the entire thing, but we didn’t really look at it until recently, she said. And when we played it back frame by frame, the evidence was right there, and now I’m going to show you. Candace said that in the original video Shainer uploaded, a female voice can be heard in the background, which coincides with the moment the suspect was seen moving away from the event area.

 If you time it from where he was to the safe area, it was obvious that something was wrong. He was leaving faster than a normal human being would have done in that situation. So, I wondered, could that woman have helped him? Candace paused, then told the audience, “I’m sorry. I know this sounds unbelievable, but it all fits together so well that it’s hard to ignore.

 The question now is, who is this woman?” According to sources in Candace’s group, the woman’s face was blurred in the clip and the original video is no longer available on any platform. However, those who managed to view the copy before it was deleted claimed they saw a silhouette of a person in a light colored jacket approach the suspect, hand him something, and then leave in the opposite direction.

 Candace concluded, “This is no longer speculation. This is a clue, a part of the story that someone is deliberately erasing from our collective memory.” From there, the phrase mystery woman began to spread online, appearing in podcasts, forums, and even international news reports. Fans, amateur investigators, is statisters, and even video analysis experts have all jumped in trying to recover the deleted clip to determine whether Candace Owens’s claim about a female character who may have helped change the course of the entire incident

is actually true. And right there, the photo shows Sam standing across the street. He’s clearly there, right in the frame. Then she talks about the alleged suspect in the incident. And she says, “I wonder if the other girl gave him something.” Then another voice off camera says, “You know, you’re recording.

” And she says, “I’m sorry, I didn’t realize.” Everything in the clip is so clear and seamless that it’s hard to deny. In fact, upon closer inspection, the independent investigation team suggested we slow down that part because they realized Candace Owens was implying that the FBI overlooked a crucial detail, the timestamps.

 And it’s here that the story gets murkiest. If what Candace said was true, that there was another woman near the suspect just before leaving the scene, why didn’t the FBI mention her? Where is the search for that woman? And why are they acting as if she never existed? None of those pieces fit together. When Candace publicly questioned these irregularities, the internet exploded.

 Forums, podcasts, and even international news outlets began to seriously question the integrity of the investigation. But just as the controversy reached its peak, Candace made an even more shocking revelation. She released a private text message allegedly between Charlie Kirk and a close associate in which Charlie expressed his intention to withdraw from the pro-Israel agenda entirely, allegedly as a way to prove that he had turned down several large donations.

Initially, the online community assumed the messages were fake or doctorred. But what really got things going was several Turning Point America staffers confirmed to the press that the conversation was real. And as you might expect, the internet went into meltdown. Millions of shares, analysis, and speculations flooded across platforms.

 Some believe this was evidence that Charlie had changed his political stance before his death, while others suggested someone was deliberately manipulating information to control the narrative after the incident. Regardless of the truth, Candace’s Owen’s revelations took the story to a whole new level where everything from motives, relationships, to personal beliefs were put on the table.

 I want to start today by talking about a topic that has been getting a lot of attention. The group text messages that Candace Owens made public and shared. I want to get straight to the point because, you know, this is the screenshot that I shared with everyone. It’s completely authentic. It’s not doctorred. And I think it’s time we address it because the truth is finally coming out.

 First of all, I have to make it clear that the reason I didn’t make that screenshot public is because it was a private conversation and I really felt it was inappropriate to share it with the public. I didn’t want to betray my friend’s trust in this story. However, because of how quickly things have developed, I had to share it with some people in the government.

 Remember, within 33 hours, the authorities had identified and arrested the suspect. During that chaotic time, we were just trying to make sure that we didn’t miss any details. So, I sent this information to a few people in authority just to help with the verification process. I don’t know what happened after that, but it’s clear that things have spread beyond what was initially anticipated.

And then, just when everyone thought Candace Spot Owens was the only one who was persistently pursuing the Charlie Kirk case, Joe Rogan suddenly stepped in. And the shocking thing is Joe hasn’t kept quiet. According to sources close to him, he’s been doing his own investigation and has expressed suspicions that the entire Charlie Kirk event may not have been a random act.

Joe says it all seems premeditated with signs of an organized chain of events. And here’s the part that really blew everyone’s minds. The name Erica Kirk, Charlie’s wife, was mentioned. According to inside sources, Joe Rogan suspected that Erica may have played some role in the conflicts that broke out.

 There was no official statement from Erica’s side, but Joe Rogan’s direct involvement and public questioning sent social media into a frenzy. Forums, podcasts, and news outlets all began to question the true motives behind the incident. From a private text message thread, the story spiraled out of control, unleashing a new information storm where facts, theories, and denials began to blend together, leaving the public unsure what to believe.

 And then things started to get messy. According to inside sources, Joe Rogan believes that Erica may have been the reason why Charlie and Candace’s relationship began to fall apart. It seems that Erica wanted more control over Charlie, not only in her personal life, but also in major decisions at Turning Point America, especially regarding donors and financial support.

 And if that wasn’t shocking enough, Joe is said to have said that before things took a turn for the worse, Candace tried to warn Charlie about Erica, that she might be trying to influence the organization from within. However, according to Joe, Erica quickly turned things around. She turned Candace’s warning into the opposite story, causing Charlie to gradually lose trust and distance himself from Candace.

Not long after, Charlie withdrew from the public eye and disappeared from the media. Joe also noted that Erica didn’t seem too interested in clarifying the truth surrounding the incident, as if she was too quick to say she had forgiven. That young man on the cross, our savior said, “Father, forgive them for they not know what they do.

” That man, that young man, I forgive him. And frankly, she didn’t even seem interested in pursuing justice or asking for further investigation into what led to Charlie’s departure. Meanwhile, Candace Owens went in the opposite direction. She dug deeper, asked more questions, and repeatedly publicly suspected that the FBI might be hiding something.

 She kept looking for the truth despite public pressure and silence from those in power within the organization. Honestly, Joe Rogan’s public disclosure of the rift between Candace Owens and Erica Kirk completely changed the way the public viewed the incident. It opened up a new perspective on the dynamics of power, the behind-the-scenes minations, and the controversial path that led to Erica’s rise to CEO of Turning Point USA.

 And if you think about it, things start to look a little strange. The way Erica seemed so calm after Charlie’s passing, almost without any sign of grief, begs the question, how could she so quickly return to pushing the same policies and positions that Charlie was once said to want to retreat from? That’s why this story continues to spread.

 Because it’s not just a personal incident, but a struggle for influence, power, and truth between three big names, Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens, and Erica Kirk. Things now started to get more suspicious than ever. When Joe Rogan revealed that Candace Owens had tried to warn Charlie Kirk about Erica, social media exploded.

Thousands of comments poured in. Yes, and Joe wasn’t the only one who suspected Charlie’s mysterious departure. It all seemed out of place and everyone had the feeling that the truth was being hidden. After the incident, Erica Kirk quickly took control of Turning Point, appearing in interviews and making statements that seemed pre-prepared.

 Fans began to question, was Tyler Robinson just a scapegoat? Some speculated that Trump and Erica were also involved and that the government was trying to cover up something. Now all eyes are on Candace. Was she right to warn Charlie in the first place or did Joe Rogan make things more complicated? Share your thoughts in the comments and don’t forget to watch the next video because the truth doesn’t stop there.