f.After the results were announced: Hakeem Jeffries CRITICIZED President Trump that he did not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.f

AFTER THE RESULTS WERE ANNOUNCED: Hakeem Jeffries Publicly SLAMS President Trump Over Nobel Peace Prize — “He Doesn’t Deserve It,” He Says — But One of His 10 Reasons Left the Entire World Stunned

When the Nobel Committee announced the final shortlist for the Nobel Peace Prize, global attention quickly turned toward one familiar name: Donald J. Trump. The former president’s nomination — reportedly based on his role in multiple international peace negotiations and economic normalization deals — instantly divided the world. Supporters hailed it as long-overdue recognition of his “peace through strength” doctrine. Critics, however, saw it as a distortion of the very spirit of the award.

Among the loudest voices of dissent was House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who didn’t hold back. Moments after the announcement, Jeffries addressed reporters on Capitol Hill with fiery conviction:

“Donald Trump does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize — what he did was not peacebuilding, it was exploitation,” he declared.

Jeffries then laid out 10 reasons to justify his position — a list that has since become one of the most discussed statements in Washington this year.

1. “Peace built on profit isn’t peace.”

Jeffries accused Trump of turning diplomatic efforts into personal brand-building opportunities, suggesting that many of his international actions were motivated by financial gain or image enhancement rather than genuine humanitarian intent.

2. “Temporary deals don’t equal lasting stability.”

He pointed to several peace accords signed during Trump’s term that later faltered or lost momentum, arguing that “quick deals designed for headlines” rarely endure.

3. “Weaponizing division at home contradicts peace abroad.”

Jeffries emphasized that a leader who incites conflict within his own nation cannot simultaneously be celebrated as a global peacemaker. “You cannot fan flames of division and then expect the world to call you a firefighter,” he said.

4. “Diplomacy without empathy is empty.”

He claimed Trump’s foreign relations lacked human compassion — describing his tone toward allies as “transactional, not transformational.”

5. “Peace requires truth — not propaganda.”

Jeffries criticized what he called “the rewriting of history,” where selective narratives glorified Trump’s actions while ignoring their consequences.

6. “No peace built on fear survives.”

He argued that Trump’s international policies often relied on intimidation and sanctions rather than reconciliation — tools that might force silence, but not genuine peace.

7. “Human rights were never his priority.”

Jeffries cited examples of global crises where Trump’s administration “looked the other way,” suggesting that moral responsibility was sacrificed for political leverage.

8. “You can’t claim peace while glorifying violence.”

He referred to domestic unrest during Trump’s tenure, saying that “when a leader normalizes chaos, it echoes beyond borders.”

9. “Peace cannot be self-awarded.”

Jeffries mocked the notion that a leader could publicly campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize, comparing it to “a performer demanding applause before the curtain even rises.”

And then came reason number 10 — the one that shocked the entire world.

10. “The secret letter.”

According to Jeffries, one of the Nobel Committee’s justifications for Trump’s nomination referenced a confidential diplomatic letter exchanged during 2018 — reportedly tied to the denuclearization talks with North Korea. But Jeffries claimed that this letter, which had been kept out of public record, contained something “deeply concerning.”

While he didn’t disclose its full contents, he alleged that it wasn’t written by Trump himself, but by a senior adviser who later admitted the letter’s tone and message were “crafted to manipulate global perception.” In Jeffries’ words:

“If the foundation of your peace is a lie, then it’s not peace — it’s theater.”

The statement sent shockwaves through the media. Within hours, hashtags like #NobelGate and #TheSecretLetter began trending worldwide. Journalists, analysts, and even members of the Nobel Committee were pressed for answers. Was there truly an undisclosed communication that shaped Trump’s nomination narrative? And if so, what did it contain?

While some dismissed Jeffries’ claim as political drama, others called for transparency. Several European newspapers hinted at an “internal review” within the Nobel Committee, though no official comment has been made.

Meanwhile, Trump’s supporters responded fiercely. Former administration officials called Jeffries’ remarks “slanderous” and “baseless.” One advisor tweeted:

“President Trump brought peace to regions others only talked about. Hakeem Jeffries brings division — not truth.”

But political strategists note that the controversy has once again placed Trump at the center of global conversation — a position he often thrives in. Whether the Nobel Committee ultimately includes or excludes him, the battle over his “worthiness” may now overshadow the prize itself.

In a fiery CNN interview the next day, Jeffries stood by his words:

“Peace is not a performance. It’s a principle. And when that principle is traded for personal glory, the world loses faith — and so does history.”

Across social media, reactions remain split. Some praised Jeffries for “speaking truth to power,” while others accused him of politicizing what should be an independent international honor.

But regardless of political affiliation, one truth has emerged: the debate over Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize nomination has become a mirror reflecting the deeper divisions of our time — between truth and perception, power and morality, recognition and responsibility.

As one editorial in The Guardian wrote, “Perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize was never meant to be a trophy for power, but a test of conscience. And this controversy has reminded the world how fragile that conscience can be.”

Whether Jeffries’ 10th reason is ultimately proven or disproven, the ripple effect of his accusation will linger far beyond this year’s Nobel ceremony — challenging not only Trump’s legacy, but the integrity of global recognition itself.

Because sometimes, what shakes the world isn’t the prize that’s given — but the truth that’s uncovered in the fight over who deserves it.